16. WTO: Evolution and Contemporary Issues
Free Economy rapid revision notes for UPSC, APPSC and TGPSC. Original notes are presented below with their tables, images and visual aids preserved.
16. WTO: Evolution and Contemporary Issues
16.1 From GATT to WTO
After the Second World War, the Bretton Woods Conference (1944) created the IMF and the World Bank. A third body, the International Trade Organisation (ITO), was planned in the Havana Charter (1948) but was never set up because the US did not ratify it. In its place the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), signed in 1947 by 23 countries, took effect from 1 January 1948.
GATT trade rounds
Round |
Years |
Focus |
Geneva, Annecy, Torquay |
1947 to 1951 |
Tariff cuts on goods |
Geneva and Dillon |
1956 and 1960-61 |
Tariff cuts |
Kennedy Round |
1964-67 |
Tariff cuts and an Anti-Dumping Code |
Tokyo Round |
1973-79 |
Tariffs and non-tariff barriers such as subsidies and technical standards |
Uruguay Round |
1986-94 |
Launched at Punta del Este; concluded with the Marrakesh Agreement (April 1994); added services, intellectual property and agriculture, and created the WTO |
Remember
|
16.2 Structure and Functioning
Body |
Role |
Ministerial Conference |
Highest decision-making body; meets at least once every two years |
General Council |
Runs the WTO between conferences; also meets as the Dispute Settlement Body and the Trade Policy Review Body |
Councils |
For Trade in Goods, Trade in Services and TRIPS |
Secretariat |
Led by the Director-General; does administrative and technical work, with no power to make decisions for members |
Decisions are taken by consensus. Each member has one vote, but a vote is rarely used.
The Trade Policy Review Mechanism regularly reviews the trade policies of members.
Core principles
Principle |
Meaning |
Most Favoured Nation (MFN) |
A trade benefit given to one member must be given to all members |
National Treatment |
Imported goods must be treated no less favourably than domestic goods once they enter the market |
Tariff binding |
Members commit to upper limits ("bound rates") on their tariffs |
Transparency |
Trade rules must be published and notified |
Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT) |
Extra flexibility and longer time for developing and least developed countries |
Reciprocity |
Members exchange comparable market access |
Exceptions include general exceptions for public morals, health and the environment (Article XX of GATT), national security (Article XXI), regional trade agreements (Article XXIV), and safeguards, anti-dumping and countervailing measures.
16.3 Major WTO Agreements
Agreement |
Key Point |
GATT 1994 |
Trade in goods |
GATS |
Trade in services, through four modes: cross-border supply, consumption abroad, commercial presence and movement of persons |
TRIPS |
Minimum standards for intellectual property rights such as patents, copyright and geographical indications |
TRIMs |
Investment measures that affect trade, such as local content rules |
Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) |
Rules on market access, domestic support and export competition |
SPS and TBT |
Sanitary and phytosanitary measures (food safety, animal and plant health) and technical barriers to trade |
Anti-Dumping, Subsidies (SCM) and Safeguards |
Rules for trade remedies against unfair or sudden imports |
Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) |
Agreed at Bali (MC9, 2013); in force from 22 February 2017; simplifies customs procedures |
Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies |
Agreed at MC12 (June 2022); bans subsidies for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing; entered into force in September 2025 |
Agriculture: the "boxes"
Box |
Meaning |
Green box |
Subsidies that do not distort trade (research, extension, food security stocks, income support not linked to production). Allowed without limit |
Amber box |
Trade-distorting support linked to prices or output. Capped by the de minimis limit: 5% of the value of production for developed countries and 10% for developing countries |
Blue box |
Support linked to production-limiting programmes |
S&DT box |
Input and investment subsidies to poor farmers in developing countries |
16.4 Dispute Settlement
A member files a complaint, which leads to consultations (60 days), then a panel, and then an appeal to the Appellate Body.
Rulings are adopted by negative consensus (automatic unless every member votes against), which makes the system strong.
The Appellate Body has not functioned since 11 December 2019, because the United States blocked the appointment of new judges and its quorum of three was lost.
A member that loses at the panel stage can appeal "into the void", which stops the ruling from becoming binding.
MPIA (Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement, 2020) is a workaround used by the EU and some other members; India is not part of it.
16.5 Ministerial Conferences
MC |
Venue and Year |
Key Outcome |
MC3 |
Seattle, 1999 |
Collapsed amid protests and developing country objections |
MC4 |
Doha, 2001 |
Launched the Doha Development Agenda (DDA); TRIPS and public health declaration |
MC5 |
Cancun, 2003 |
Talks broke down; the G20 developing countries group emerged on agriculture |
MC6 |
Hong Kong, 2005 |
Agreed to end agricultural export subsidies by 2013 |
MC9 |
Bali, 2013 |
Trade Facilitation Agreement; interim peace clause on public stockholding |
MC10 |
Nairobi, 2015 |
Ended agricultural export subsidies |
MC12 |
Geneva, 2022 |
Fisheries Subsidies Agreement; TRIPS waiver limited to COVID-19 vaccines; e-commerce moratorium extended |
MC13 |
Abu Dhabi, 2024 |
E-commerce moratorium extended to MC14; no permanent solution on public stockholding |
MC14 |
Yaounde, Cameroon, 2026 |
Ended in March 2026 without consensus |
MC14 (Yaounde, March 2026)
|
16.6 India and the WTO: Contemporary Issues
Issue |
India's Position |
Public stockholding (PSH) |
India buys foodgrain at MSP for the public distribution system. The WTO formula for measuring subsidy uses 1986-88 reference prices, which makes India's support look larger than it is. India wants a permanent solution and not only an interim peace clause |
Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) |
India and other developing countries want a way to raise tariffs temporarily if imports surge or prices fall, to protect small farmers |
Plurilateral agreements |
India opposes bringing plurilateral deals, such as IFD and the e-commerce Joint Statement Initiative, into the WTO without consensus, saying they weaken the multilateral, consensus-based system |
E-commerce moratorium |
India has opposed making it permanent, as it loses customs revenue on digital goods |
Fisheries subsidies |
India seeks protection and a long transition for small, traditional fishers |
S&DT |
India opposes attempts by developed members to reduce the special treatment of developing countries |
TRIPS and public health |
India supports flexibilities such as compulsory licensing, based on the Doha Declaration (2001) |
Wider challenges
Unilateral tariffs and trade wars weaken the MFN principle and the idea of bound tariffs.
Dispute settlement is weakened without a working Appellate Body.
Subsidies and industrial policy by large economies make it hard to maintain a level playing field.
Climate and trade: measures such as the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism raise questions about WTO rules and fairness to developing countries.
WTO reform: how to take decisions, how to treat developing members and how to restore dispute settlement.
Quick Recall
|
Explore structured courses and guidance for your target examination.
